Conflict is the motor for identity change

Evaluate the claim that conflict is ‘the motor for identity change’.
Conflict refers to any ‘tension between wishes or between events that make the flow of life less smooth, less even, less effortless’ (Holloway, 2009, pg.252) on the emphasis of identity change, and can be seen in the changes of life’s circumstances. In this essay I will look further into the claim that conflict is ‘the motor for identity change’ in Silma’s case study by evaluating the evidence, concepts and theories of identity name them and in the key concepts of understanding identity changes which are: ordinary conflict, identification, practices and relationships. Our identities are influenced by other people’s views and perceptions of us, and in the changes of those relationships. Migration is a factor in our identities as people move between places and roles, therefore changing our connections and ‘disconnections’ with people and in ourselves to adapt to new situations, people, groups and environments in our lives, which can form new identification. Continuing relationships with people provide continuity in our own identities, where making new relationships with people can influence identity change and lead to ordinary conflict through the changes of life’s circumstances, which is seen as the motor for identity change. A solid overview introducing the topic of identity
Erik Erikson, a pPsychologist studied in the 1950s studied identity change through the life course and how a person’s identity is influenced by past experiences which change in the new tasks and movements that confront people as they live their lives. Erikson defined identity as a sense of one’s continuity over time as a being or entity that is different from others, new sentence here he claimed that the movement in changing identities was not smooth and forward development was always happening. He called this a series of ‘identity crises’. Full stop after brackets (Holloway, 2009, pg.252) Some people’s…